These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12616008)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 12616008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 May; 14(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20403792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Brancato B; Catarzi S; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):480-8. PubMed ID: 15195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation.
    Morton MJ; Whaley DH; Brandt KR; Amrami KK
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 16569779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.
    Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.
    Baker JA; Rosen EL; Lo JY; Gimenez EI; Walsh R; Soo MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):1083-8. PubMed ID: 14500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review.
    Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Burke P; Visioli C; Paci E; Zappa M
    Br J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 89(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 14583763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.