BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1261705)

  • 1. Letter: A look at the national cancer program.
    Pekar PP
    Fed Proc; 1976 Apr; 35(5):1113. PubMed ID: 1261705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Role of the National Cancer Institute on organizing oncological research in the USA].
    Kiselev AK
    Vopr Onkol; 1978; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 636373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost analysis and consequences of the National Cancer Plan.
    Pekar PP
    Fed Proc; 1974 Nov; 33(11):2225-30. PubMed ID: 4430379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter: Assessing the national cancer program.
    Laszlo J
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Jul; 293(4):205-6. PubMed ID: 1134546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regarding "ACE Policy Committee letter".
    Ness RB;
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 16(10):796. PubMed ID: 17011479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Werner MH
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The support of clinical research and training by the National Institutes of Health. Introduction to the symposium.
    Wyngaarden JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1985 Jul; 145(7):1241-4. PubMed ID: 4015273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Report of the Cancer Chemotherapy Collaborative Program Review Committee: the Richardson report. June 1966, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1984 Jan; 68(1):343-56. PubMed ID: 6692435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proceedings: International collaborative studies of cancer in man: role of the National Cancer Institute.
    Haenszel W
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1974 Feb; 40():75-81. PubMed ID: 4819413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Cancer Program, 1971--1976.
    Newell GR
    Prog Clin Cancer; 1978; 7():1-10. PubMed ID: 704880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Budget and The National Cancer Program (NCP).
    Rauscher FJ
    Cancer Res; 1974 Jul; 34(7):1743-8. PubMed ID: 4833919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oral health research personnel. National Research Council.
    J Dent Educ; 1994 Sep; 58(9):714-20. PubMed ID: 7962926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protest letter accuses health agency of biodefence bias.
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):7. PubMed ID: 15744263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International impact of the National Cancer Program.
    O'Conor GT
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Aug; 59(2 Suppl):693-9. PubMed ID: 886627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subverting U.S. health.
    Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():M4. PubMed ID: 14971390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five years into the National Cancer Program.
    Schmidt BC
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 888453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time to demand funding.
    Mello CC; Walsh JV
    Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5911):208. PubMed ID: 19131609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.