These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12617506)

  • 1. Methods of reducing loss of efficiency due to discreteness of distributions.
    Cohen A; Sackrowitz HB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 12617506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing whether treatment is 'better' than control with ordered categorical data: an evaluation of new methodology.
    Cohen A; Sackrowitz HB; Sackrowitz M
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(19):2699-712. PubMed ID: 10986543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotic log-linear analysis: some cautions concerning sparse frequency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Feb; 94(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15077743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The exact analysis of contingency tables in medical research.
    Mehta CR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 7952429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On measures of agreement calculated from contingency tables with categories defined by the empirical quantiles of the marginal distributions.
    Borkowf CB; Gail MH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 146(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 9290513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency robust tests of independence in contingency tables with ordered classifications.
    Podgor MJ; Gastwirth JL; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2095-105. PubMed ID: 8896142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction algorithm for finite sample statistics.
    Pöschel T; Ebeling W; Frömmel C; Ramírez R
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2003 Dec; 12(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 15007750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with discreteness: making 'exact' confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact.
    Agresti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 12617505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous Bayesian analysis of contingency tables in genetic association studies.
    Dickhaus T
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Aug; 14(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 26215535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test for psychometric function shift.
    Logvinenko AD; Tyurin YN; Sawey M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 22083658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bivariate categorical data analysis using normal linear conditional multinomial probability model.
    Sun B; Sutradhar B
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 25320019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power and sample size requirements for two-part models.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11304738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.