These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12618254)
1. Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trial. Dean G; Cardenas L; Darney P; Goldberg A Contraception; 2003 Mar; 67(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 12618254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Similarities in women's perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion. Bird ST; Harvey SM; Beckman LJ; Nichols MD; Rogers K; Blumenthal PD Contraception; 2003 Mar; 67(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 12618255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early first-trimester abortion: a controlled study of complication rates. Goldberg AB; Dean G; Kang MS; Youssof S; Darney PD Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 14704252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration as methods of early abortion. Bird ST; Harvey SM; Nichols MD; Edelman A J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2001; 56(3):124-6. PubMed ID: 11506150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment. Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manual compared with electric vacuum aspiration for abortion at less than 6 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Dean G; Colarossi L; Porsch L; Betancourt G; Jacobs A; Paul ME Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 125(5):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 25932839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: a systematic review. Wen J; Cai QY; Deng F; Li YP BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 18053098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion. Mittal S; Sehgal R; Aggarwal S; Aruna J; Bahadur A; Kumar G Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21112054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pain and time of procedures with two first-trimester abortion techniques performed by residents and faculty. Edelman A; Nichols MD; Jensen J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1564-7. PubMed ID: 11408881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manual vacuum aspiration, a safe and effective alternative in early pregnancy termination. Hemlin J; Möller B Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Jun; 80(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 11380295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient acceptability of manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy loss. Edwards S; Tureck R; Fredrick M; Huang X; Zhang J; Barnhart K J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Dec; 16(10):1429-36. PubMed ID: 18062758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial of misoprostol compared with manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion. Weeks A; Alia G; Blum J; Winikoff B; Ekwaru P; Durocher J; Mirembe F Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 16135584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rates of complication in first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by doctors and mid-level providers in South Africa and Vietnam: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Warriner IK; Meirik O; Hoffman M; Morroni C; Harries J; My Huong NT; Vy ND; Seuc AH Lancet; 2006 Dec; 368(9551):1965-72. PubMed ID: 17141703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae. Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA Hum Reprod; 1994 Nov; 9(11):2167-72. PubMed ID: 7868693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe and cost-effective substitute of electric vacuum aspiration for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss. Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Fatima S; Sultana M J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Feb; 61(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 21375164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) in the management of first trimester pregnancy loss. Gazvani R; Honey E; MacLennan FM; Templeton A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Feb; 112(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 14746959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doulas for surgical management of miscarriage and abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Wilson SF; Gurney EP; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):44.e1-44.e6. PubMed ID: 27612588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptability and clinical outcomes of first- and second-trimester surgical abortion by suction aspiration in Colombia. DePiñeres T; Baum S; Grossman D Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 24939803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]