219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12618493)
1. Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests.
Wang L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(5):344-6. PubMed ID: 12618493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted mammographic imaging.
Boggis CR; Astley SM
Breast Cancer Res; 2000; 2(6):392-5. PubMed ID: 11250731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science.
Randal J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1630-2. PubMed ID: 11036103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population: clinical and economic implications.
Killelea BK; Long JB; Chagpar AB; Ma X; Wang R; Ross JS; Gross CP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mass breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: 10 years and counting.
Kuska B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1764-6. PubMed ID: 9839512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost evaluation of breast cancer screening in France.
Lamarque JL; Pujol J; Cherifcheikh J; Laurent JC; Taourel P; Boulet P; Daurès JP; Séguret F; Guizard AV; Delande G; Negre M
Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S336-9. PubMed ID: 9750847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Higher mammography screening costs without appreciable clinical benefit: the case of digital mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Hubbard R; Tosteson AN
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening.
Overmoyer B
Med Clin North Am; 1999 Nov; 83(6):1443-66, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 10584602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
Feig S
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: costs and efficiency].
Golder WA
Onkologie; 2001 Apr; 24(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 11441302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
Humphrey LL; Ballard DJ
Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.
Sato M; Kawai M; Nishino Y; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N; Ishibashi T
Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23104393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New technological capacities of the 3d millennium mammography. Proceedings of ECR-2000, Vienna, March 4-10, 2000].
Rozhkova NI; Burdina II; Prokopenko SP
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2001; (1):62-4. PubMed ID: 11338876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening fundamentals.
Smith RA
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):15-9. PubMed ID: 9709269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
Begg CB
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):540-1; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of mammography in women older than 65 years of age.
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):I34. PubMed ID: 14623641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mass screening of breast cancer: response and justification].
Bartsch P; Gordenne W
Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):214-5. PubMed ID: 9641017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
