These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12618791)

  • 1. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific credit and credibility.
    Grant PM
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bell Labs launches inquiry into allegations of data duplication.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):367-8. PubMed ID: 12024177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update on Scholarly Publication Ethics: Navigating the Confusing Landscape.
    Reid C; Cress P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1195-1197. PubMed ID: 27329663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
    Haug CJ
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fabrication, falsification et Al.
    Reider B
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 20194952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraud: just say no!
    Blaustein JD
    Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
    Kvaal SI
    J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. China cracks down on fake peer reviews.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reminder about scholarly integrity.
    Krauss JB
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2003 Dec; 17(6):247-8. PubMed ID: 14685948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unacceptable practice in our field.
    Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Nov; 102-B(11):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 33135453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Banish cronyism.
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):446. PubMed ID: 23099363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.