These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12618792)
21. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud. Carrió I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth. Dalton R Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Standards for ethical publication. Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted. Service RF Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fraud: just say no! Blaustein JD Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The joy of discovery. de Duve C Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?]. Levi R Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity. Hadi MA Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. China cracks down on fake peer reviews. Cyranoski D Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base. Jette AM Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cooperate to stop misconduct. Qualkenbush L Nature; 2018 May; 557(7707):637. PubMed ID: 29849159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud. Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed. Else H Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7879):19-20. PubMed ID: 34594025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement. Kumar MN Account Res; 2009 Nov; 16(6):307-30. PubMed ID: 19866380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers. Balter M Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Integrity from the top down. Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):569. PubMed ID: 12167816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Retraction recommended for enzyme-chip paper. Abbott A Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):540-1. PubMed ID: 20671680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]