BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12619128)

  • 1. Preservation of the negative image of tooth enamel with dental impression material enhances morphometric measurements of gingival overgrowth.
    Miller ML; Andringa A; Turner LT; Dalton TP; Derkenne S; Nebert DW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Apr; 60(5):528-36. PubMed ID: 12619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
    Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A crown reconstructing method for resin-embedded transparent teeth.
    Yamamoto T; Domon T; Takahashi S; Islam MN; Wakita M
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(10):749-51. PubMed ID: 14620264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DIAGNOdent measurements and correlation with the depth and volume of minimally invasive cavity preparations.
    Hamilton JC; Gregory WA; Valentine JB
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 16802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of polyvinyl siloxane for complete and partial denture impressions.
    Sami I; Eid HI; Alsayed SM
    Egypt Dent J; 1990 Apr; 36(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 2103905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures.
    Hsu YT; Farmer JB
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue contributions to sex and race: differences in tooth crown size of deciduous molars.
    Harris EF; Hicks JD; Barcroft BD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Jul; 115(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 11424074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.