These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12619128)

  • 21. Gingival volume measurement through the analysis of tooth crown area: a digital and computed method.
    Rodrigues GG; Madureira DF; Lages EM; Lages EJ; Pretti H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 22754906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions.
    Martin N; Martin MV; Jedynakiewicz NM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):760-8. PubMed ID: 17353045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving the stability of maxillaiy dentures: the use of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials for edentulous impressions.
    Massad J; Davis WJ; Lobel W; June R; Thornton J
    Dent Today; 2005 Feb; 24(2):118, 120-3; quiz 123, 140. PubMed ID: 15768945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gingival zenith positions and levels of the maxillary anterior dentition.
    Chu SJ; Tan JH; Stappert CF; Tarnow DP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 19368601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of changes in gingival contour from three-dimensional co-ordinate data in subjects with drug-induced gingival overgrowth.
    Thomason JM; Ellis JS; Jovanovski V; Corson M; Lynch E; Seymour RA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 32(10):1069-75. PubMed ID: 16174270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Levy G; Brosh T; Harel N; Ganor Y; Pilo R
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
    De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative analysis of dental enamel polyvinylsiloxane impression and polyurethane casting methods for SEM research.
    Galbany J; Estebaranz F; Martínez LM; Romero A; De Juan J; Turbón D; Pérez-Pérez A
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Apr; 69(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 16586485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct temporary-provisional crown fabrication mends tooth in timely manner.
    Wright MG
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1997; 76(3):19. PubMed ID: 9518748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
    Kugel G; Swift EJ; Sorensen JA; Tucker JH; Dunne JT
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth.
    Lee H; Park C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):377-8. PubMed ID: 17098503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Studies on the impression of crown preparations by means of the double impression method with special reference to the widening of the gingival pocket].
    Weiskopf J; Frentzen H; Schönherr U
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1967 Jan; 17(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 5336041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Management of the flabby ridge: using contemporary materials to solve an old problem.
    Lynch CD; Allen PF
    Br Dent J; 2006 Mar; 200(5):258-61. PubMed ID: 16528326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.