These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12621284)

  • 1. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
    Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anthropometric and cephalometric measurements of the adult face.
    Farkas LG; Tompson B; Phillips JH; Katic MJ; Cornfoot ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Jan; 10(1):18-25; discussion 26. PubMed ID: 10388422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the facial esthetics in an Ivory Coast population].
    N'Dindin-Guinan BA; Djaha K; Aka A; Faure J; Roux H
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2000 Sep; 23(91):15-22. PubMed ID: 11372130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of linear cephalometric dimensions in Americans of European descent (Ann Arbor, Cleveland, Philadelphia) and Americans of African descent (Nashville).
    Dibbets JM; Nolte K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 12169032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Racial variations in cephalometric analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis.
    Behbehani F; Hicks EP; Beeman C; Kluemper GT; Rayens MK
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 16637719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adult cephalometric norms for Saudi Arabians with a comparison of values for Saudi and North American Caucasians.
    Shalhoub SY; Sarhan OA; Shaikh HS
    Br J Orthod; 1987 Nov; 14(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 3481279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.
    Raschke GF; Rieger UM; Bader RD; Guentsch A; Schaefer O; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 22893037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.
    Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements.
    Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Prahl-Andersen B; Wattel E; Uljee IH
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.