These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12621285)

  • 1. The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement.
    Chang PS; Parker TH; Patrick CW; Miller MJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 12621285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction of proptosis and zygomaticomaxillary asymmetry using orbital wall decompression and zygoma reduction in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia.
    Choi JW; Lee SW; Koh KS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 19276831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth.
    Ko EW; Chen PK; Tai IC; Huang CS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 22094394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement.
    Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):934-5. PubMed ID: 14733217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
    Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schön R; Teschner M; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R; Gutwald R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e1-10. PubMed ID: 17656126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies.
    Richtsmeier JT; Deleon VB
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Aug; 12(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 19627516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is craniofacial morphology in Apert and Crouzon syndromes the same?
    Kreiborg S; Cohen MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Dec; 56(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 10066112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and growth in unrepaired isolated cleft palate patients.
    Xu Y; Yang C; Schreuder WH; Shi J; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1853-60. PubMed ID: 25169446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Preoperative accuracy of selective laser sintering (SLS) in craniofacial 3D modeling: comparison with patient CT data].
    Kaim AH; Kirsch EC; Alder P; Bucher P; Hammer B
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 19253203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility.
    Waitzman AA; Posnick JC; Armstrong DC; Pron GE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 1571344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topological optimization for designing patient-specific large craniofacial segmental bone replacements.
    Sutradhar A; Paulino GH; Miller MJ; Nguyen TH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(30):13222-7. PubMed ID: 20628014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Cho HJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis.
    Lee SC; Park JH; Bayome M; Kim KB; Araujo EA; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):638-48. PubMed ID: 24785928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional craniofacial reconstruction imaging.
    Papadopoulos MA; Christou PK; Christou PK; Athanasiou AE; Boettcher P; Zeilhofer HF; Sader R; Papadopulos NA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 12029276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Suri S; Utreja A; Khandelwal N; Mago SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):418-29. PubMed ID: 18774088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior craniofacial resection for ethmoid and nasal cancer with free flap reconstruction.
    Bridger GP; Baldwin M
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Mar; 115(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 2917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial.
    D'Urso PS; Barker TM; Earwaker WJ; Bruce LJ; Atkinson RL; Lanigan MW; Arvier JF; Effeney DJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 27(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 10188125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative stereolithographic model planning for primary reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial trauma surgery.
    Kermer C; Lindner A; Friede I; Wagner A; Millesi W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 26(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9702630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.