155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12623544)
21. Effect of conditioning method and testing method on strength of lithium-induced taste aversion learning.
Limebeer CL; Parker LA
Behav Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 120(4):963-9. PubMed ID: 16893301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Increasing children's liking of vegetables through flavour-flavour learning.
Havermans RC; Jansen A
Appetite; 2007 Mar; 48(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 17113192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reinforcer devaluation in palatability-based learned flavor preferences.
Dwyer DM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 16248735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extinction of conditioned flavor preferences.
Delamater AR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Apr; 33(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 17469964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Sep; 89(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 16854441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Conditioned flavor avoidance as a measure of withdrawal in rats chronically exposed to a caffeine solution.
Dreumont-Boudreau SE; Dingle RN; Alcolado GM; Lolordo VM
Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18602412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Caffeine dependence in rats: effects of exposure duration and concentration.
Dingle RN; Dreumont-Boudreau SE; Lolordo VM
Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 18598710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flavor preferences conditioned by high-fat versus high-carbohydrate diets vary as a function of session length.
Lucas F; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1999 May; 66(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 10357427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reinforcing and aversive effects of caffeine measured by flavor preference conditioning in caffeine-naive and caffeine-acclimated rats.
Myers KP; Izbicki EV
Physiol Behav; 2006 Jul; 88(4-5):585-96. PubMed ID: 16806323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism?
Artigas AA; Sansa J; Prados J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 16627350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of hunger state on flavour pleasantness conditioning at home: flavour-nutrient learning vs. flavour-flavour learning.
Mobini S; Chambers LC; Yeomans MR
Appetite; 2007 Jan; 48(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 16846663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early experience and reinforcer quality in delayed flavour-food learning in the rat.
Boakes RA; Rossi-Arnaud C; Garcia-Hoz V
Appetite; 1987 Dec; 9(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 3435136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The amygdala and flavour preference conditioning: Crossed lesions and inactivation.
Dwyer DM; Iordanova MD
Physiol Behav; 2010 Nov; 101(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 20643154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of midazolam on the acquisition and expression of fructose- and maltodextrin-based flavour preferences.
Dwyer DM
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Feb; 91(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 18817805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Food deprivation enhances the expression but not acquisition of flavor acceptance conditioning in rats.
Yiin YM; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Appetite; 2005 Oct; 45(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15946767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Licking microstructure and hedonic changes after flavour preference learning in rats.
Riordan JE; Dwyer DM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2717-2725. PubMed ID: 31144575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exposures to conditioned flavours with different hedonic values induce contrasted behavioural and brain responses in pigs.
Clouard C; Jouhanneau M; Meunier-Salaün MC; Malbert CH; Val-Laillet D
PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37968. PubMed ID: 22685528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of nicotine on olfactogustatory incentives: preference, palatability, and operant choice tests.
Palmatier MI; Lantz JE; O'Brien LC; Metz SP
Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1545-54. PubMed ID: 23430737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The GluA1 AMPAR subunit is necessary for hedonic responding but not hedonic value in female mice.
Strickland JA; Austen JM; Sprengel R; Sanderson DJ
Physiol Behav; 2021 Jan; 228():113206. PubMed ID: 33058902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preference conditioning alters taste responses in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.
Giza BK; Ackroff K; McCaughey SA; Sclafani A; Scott TR
Am J Physiol; 1997 Oct; 273(4):R1230-40. PubMed ID: 9362285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
