186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12624054)
1. Five-test simple scheme for species-level identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci.
De Paulis AN; Predari SC; Chazarreta CD; Santoianni JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 41(3):1219-24. PubMed ID: 12624054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid and economical method for species identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Ieven M; Verhoeven J; Pattyn SR; Goossens H
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1060-3. PubMed ID: 7615705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of methods for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Cunha Mde L; Sinzato YK; Silveira LV
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2004 Dec; 99(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 15761602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Hussain Z; Stoakes L; Stevens DL; Schieven BC; Lannigan R; Jones C
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 3517037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species level.
Grant CE; Sewell DL; Pfaller M; Bumgardner RV; Williams JA
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Jan; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8026152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API staph system.
Gemmell CG; Dawson JE
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):874-7. PubMed ID: 6924937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of the AutoMicrobic system gram-positive identification card, API Staph-Ident, and conventional methods in the identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.
Grasmick AE; Naito N; Bruckner DA
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 18(6):1323-8. PubMed ID: 6361051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a conventional routine method for identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. Comparison with API-Staph and API-Staph-Ident.
Gahrn-Hansen B; Heltberg O; Rosdahl VT; Søgaard P
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1987 Oct; 95(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 3314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.
Janda WM; Ristow K; Novak D
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2056-9. PubMed ID: 7814525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPH-IDENT system.
Almeida RJ; Jorgensen JH
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 6352730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of modified Minitek system with Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Crouch SF; Pearson TA; Parham DM
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 25(9):1626-8. PubMed ID: 3654937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of identification systems for Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species.
Perl TM; Rhomberg PR; Bale MJ; Fuchs PC; Jones RN; Koontz FP; Pfaller MA
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Mar; 18(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 7924206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Staph ID 32 system and Staph-Zym system for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Renneberg J; Rieneck K; Gutschik E
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1150-3. PubMed ID: 7615720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of five commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species level.
Skulnick M; Patel MP; Low DE
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Nov; 8(11):1001-3. PubMed ID: 2513191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An inexpensive and reliable method for routine identification of staphylococcal species.
Monsen T; Rönnmark M; Olofsson C; Wiström J
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 May; 17(5):327-35. PubMed ID: 9721961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Differentiation of coagulase negative staphylococci from significant bacteriuria].
Schmidt H; Naumann G
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1989 Oct; 35(10):585-8. PubMed ID: 2694643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of current methods for isolation and identification of staphylococci in raw bovine milk.
Harvey J; Gilmour A
J Appl Bacteriol; 1985 Sep; 59(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 3902759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple and economical method for speciation and resistotyping of clinically significant coagulase negative staphylococci.
Goyal R; Singh NP; Kumar A; Kaur I; Singh M; Sunita N; Mathur M
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 24(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 16912440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Selected Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Blood Culture bottles and Determination of their Sensitivities to Antibiotics.
Veliev A; Nakipoglu Y
Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(3Part-I):657-662. PubMed ID: 35480513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic methods for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from blood cultures.
Hedin G
APMIS; 1994 Nov; 102(11):855-64. PubMed ID: 7833006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
