These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12625321)

  • 1. Neade v. Portes: a physician's fiduciary duty to disclose financial incentives.
    Simmons J
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):323-43. PubMed ID: 12625321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient advocates or patient adversaries? Using fiduciary law to compel disclosure of managed care financial incentives.
    Johnston K
    San Diego Law Rev; 1998; 35(4):951-92. PubMed ID: 12778919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fiduciary duty litigation experiences setbacks. Peterson v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. and Neade v. Portes.
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Jan; ():3-6. PubMed ID: 11246835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Financial incentives to limit services: should physicians be required to disclose these to patients?
    McGraw DC
    Georgetown Law J; 1995; 83():1821-47. PubMed ID: 11660268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breaking the learned helplessness of patients: why MCOs should be required to disclose finanial incentives.
    Talesh SA
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):49-95. PubMed ID: 16526104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disclosure--fiduciary duty--primary care physician incentives. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(4):87-9. PubMed ID: 14735661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competing views of physician compensation incentives disclosure espoused. Neade v. Portes.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 May; 17(7):1-6. PubMed ID: 11183065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physician will not be liable for failing to disclose financial conflict of interest. Neade v. Portes, 193 Ill. 2d 433, 739 N.E. 2d 496 (Ill. 2000).
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2001; 21(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 11411066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath.
    Swanson DS
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fiduciary duty--HMOs--disclosure--physician compensation and financial incentives. Ehlmann v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Texas, 198 F.3d 552 (5th Cir. 2000).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 11521555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trust and informed consent to rationing.
    Mechanic D
    Milbank Q; 1994; 72(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 8007897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pegram v. Herdrich: HMOs aren't perfect, but ..
    Wahl JR
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 12778921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preemption--HMO doctors' failure to disclose financial incentives--misrepresentation and fraud. Shea v. Esensten.
    Benefits Q; 2002; 18(1):84-5. PubMed ID: 11881146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some legal and ethical implications for the medical profession.
    Mathiharan K
    Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(4):79-82. PubMed ID: 16335490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fiduciaries--HMOs--incentives to ration care. Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 11372475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marketplace. Precedential Texas settlement with Aetna part of broad attack on financial incentives.
    Moskowitz DB
    Med Health; 2000 Apr; 54(16):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 11184308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complaint alleging breach of ERISA fiduciary obligation upheld. Shea v. Esensten.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Sep; 14(11):4-6. PubMed ID: 10184756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The duty to disclose HMO physician incentives.
    McRay GJ
    Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Jul; ():12-4. PubMed ID: 11484632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The patient-physician relationship in an era of scarce resources: is there a duty to treat?
    Mehlman MJ
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Oct; (176):9-51. PubMed ID: 10129977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No pain, no gain, no compensation: exploiting professional athletes through substandard medical care administered by team physicians.
    DiCello N
    Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(3):507-38. PubMed ID: 15295834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.