449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12625356)
1. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
Needleman HL
Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud.
O'Reilly JT
Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What to do about scientific misconduct.
Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuroscientist accused of misconduct turns on his accusers.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6675):424. PubMed ID: 9548238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating academic-industrial research relationships--solving problems or stifling progress?
Stossel TP
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(10):1060-5. PubMed ID: 16148294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
