175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12627174)
1. Computerization of a dietary history interview in a running cohort; evaluation within the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study.
Bakker I; Twisk JW; van Mechelen W; Mensink GB; Kemper HC
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Mar; 57(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 12627174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24 h recall EPIC SOFT program--the Norwegian calibration study.
Brustad M; Skeie G; Braaten T; Slimani N; Lund E
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Jan; 57(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 12548305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment.
Lyu LC; Hankin JH; Liu LQ; Wilkens LR; Lee JH; Goodman MT; Kolonel LN
J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9434650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of DISHES 98, a computerised dietary history interview: energy and macronutrient intake.
Mensink GB; Haftenberger M; Thamm M
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2001 Jun; 55(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 11423916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of a telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recall in telephone and non-telephone households in the rural Lower Mississippi Delta region.
Bogle M; Stuff J; Davis L; Forrester I; Strickland E; Casey PH; Ryan D; Champagne C; McGee B; Mellad K; Neal E; Zaghloul S; Yadrick K; Horton J
J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Feb; 101(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 11271695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of data collection mode and ethnicity of interviewer on response rates and self-reported alcohol use among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: an experimental study.
Dotinga A; van den Eijnden RJ; Bosveld W; Garretsen HF
Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 15797881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of a computer-based questionnaire and personal interviews in determining oral health-related behaviours.
Chestnutt IG; Morgan MZ; Hoddell C; Playle R
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 15541156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Young adolescents' nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C).
Vereecken CA; Covents M; Matthys C; Maes L
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 May; 59(5):658-67. PubMed ID: 15741983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dietary intake in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a comparison of dietary assessment methods.
Hendricks K; Tang A; Spiegelman D; Skinner S; Woods M
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 15800553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing.
Williams ML; Freeman RC; Bowen AM; Zhao Z; Elwood WN; Gordon C; Young P; Rusek R; Signes CA
AIDS Educ Prev; 2000 Jun; 12(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 10926124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.
Conway JM; Ingwersen LA; Moshfegh AJ
J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 15054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years.
Albar SA; Alwan NA; Evans CE; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(9):1678-86. PubMed ID: 26975650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observations on the reliability and validity of the design and diet history method in the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study.
Kune S; Kune GA; Watson LF
Nutr Cancer; 1987; 9(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 3543857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimizing random error in dietary intakes assessed by 24-h recall, in overweight and obese adults.
Jackson KA; Byrne NM; Magarey AM; Hills AP
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Apr; 62(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 17375109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between data obtained from repeated interviews with a six-years interval.
Martins CC; Ramos-Jorge ML; Cury JA; Pordeus IA; Paiva SM
Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Apr; 42(2):346-9. PubMed ID: 18327497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of reporting dietary intake using various portion-size aids in-person and via telephone.
Godwin SL; Chambers E; Cleveland L
J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 15054344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of telephone versus face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24-hour recall EPIC SOFT programme--the Norwegian calibration study.
Brustad M; Skeie G; Braaten T; Slimani N; Lund E
IARC Sci Publ; 2002; 156():17-9. PubMed ID: 12484113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies.
Touvier M; Kesse-Guyot E; Méjean C; Pollet C; Malon A; Castetbon K; Hercberg S
Br J Nutr; 2011 Apr; 105(7):1055-64. PubMed ID: 21080983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project.
Huybrechts I; Geelen A; de Vries JH; Casagrande C; Nicolas G; De Keyzer W; Lillegaard IT; Ruprich J; Lafay L; Wilson-van den Hooven EC; Niekerk EM; Margaritis I; Rehurkova I; Crispim SP; Freisling H; De Henauw S; Slimani N;
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S29-37. PubMed ID: 21731003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a hand-held personal digital assistant-based food diary with food photographs for Japanese subjects.
Fukuo W; Yoshiuchi K; Ohashi K; Togashi H; Sekine R; Kikuchi H; Sakamoto N; Inada S; Sato F; Kadowaki T; Akabayashi A
J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Jul; 109(7):1232-6. PubMed ID: 19559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]