229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12627565)
1. Physician assisted death: after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
Quill T
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):481-98. PubMed ID: 12627565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--rejecting assisted suicide but embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1236-9. PubMed ID: 9340517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pragmatism in the face of death: the role of facts in the assisted suicide debate.
Wolf SM
Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):1063-101. PubMed ID: 11865913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician-assisted suicide: a current legal perspective.
Myers RS
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):345-61. PubMed ID: 12866524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctor at center of Supreme Court case on assisted suicide.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11647239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High court to say if the dying have a right to suicide help.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1996 Oct; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 11647126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill prohibitions on assisted suicide do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Kawamura A
J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 14628852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An issue that won't die: Court's ruling on doctor-assisted suicide leaves some basic questions unresolved.
Scott J
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A1, A19. PubMed ID: 11647210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Give me liberty and give me death: assisted suicide as a fundamental liberty interest.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1997; 6(2):527-50. PubMed ID: 16485372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Leaving the door ajar: the Supreme Court and assisted suicide.
Urofsky MI
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 32(2):313-405. PubMed ID: 11657162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician-assisted suicide: should Texas be different?
Trenaman-Molin L
Houst Law Rev; 1997; 33(5):1475-520. PubMed ID: 12627557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician-assisted suicide: the Supreme Court's wary rejection.
Bourguignon HJ; Martyn SR
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 12625320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vacco v. Quill.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1997 Jun; 117():2293-312. PubMed ID: 12041285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted suicide and the law.
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right.
Angell M
N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8970940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court, 9-0, upholds state laws prohibiting assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A1, A19. PubMed ID: 11647211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'.
Carolan B
Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
