200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12627570)
1. What kind of public policy do we need?
Citrin T
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):547-55. PubMed ID: 12627570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?
Suter SM
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(3):669-748. PubMed ID: 12741377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
Feitshans IL
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human Genetics Commission calls for tougher rules on use and storage of genetic data.
Human Genetics Commission
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 14964203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
Slaughter LM
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of state laws to protect genetic information.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11484711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Australian joint inquiry into the Protection of Human Genetic Information.
Weisbrot D
New Genet Soc; 2003 Apr; 22(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 15282907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientists help craft gene testing law.
Science; 1996 Mar; 271(5253):1235, 1237. PubMed ID: 11644786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting our 'family secrets'.
Kahn MJ; Jamison KR; Collins FS
Washington Post; 1997 Jul; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic discrimination in health insurance--comprehensive legal solutions for a (not so) special problem?
Rich RF; Ziegler J
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 17111499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA: five distinguishing features for policy analysis.
Green RM; Thomas AM
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):571-91. PubMed ID: 12731549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental disorders and genetics: the ethical context: conclusions and recommendations.
United Kingdom. Nuffield Council on Bioethics
J Int Bioethique; 2001 Jun; 12(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 12747351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Britain creates watchdog for genetic tests.
Warden J
BMJ; 1996 Jan; 312(7024):141-2. PubMed ID: 11644765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MPs call for tough controls on human genetics.
Genethics News; 1995; No. 7():1, 3. PubMed ID: 11655124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to genetic privacy? Are we unlocking the secrets of the human genome only to risk insurance and employment discrimination?
Smith N
Utah Law Rev; 2000; 2000(3):705-58. PubMed ID: 12718305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia.
Otlowski M
Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 16789301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models.
Andrews LB
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(152):221-85. PubMed ID: 16211786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination.
McLochlin DL
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic privacy and discrimination: a survey of state legislation. Comment.
Mulholland WF; Jaeger AS
Jurimetrics; 1999; 39(3):317-26. PubMed ID: 11762444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidential! Genetics research is prompting calls for new privacy laws--before it's too late.
Regalado A
Wall St J (East Ed); 2002 Feb; ():R10. PubMed ID: 12542058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
