These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12627754)

  • 1. Interhemispheric integration of letter stimuli presented foveally or extra-foveally.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW
    Cortex; 2003 Feb; 39(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 12627754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP evidence for the split fovea theory.
    Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF; Roberts M; Nazir T
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():212-20. PubMed ID: 17956755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
    Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
    Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cortical representation of foveal stimuli: evidence from quadrantanopia and TMS-induced suppression.
    Chiang TC; Walsh V; Lavidor M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 15511647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli.
    Brysbaert M
    Behav Brain Res; 1994 Oct; 64(1-2):151-61. PubMed ID: 7840882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foveal word reading requires interhemispheric communication.
    Hunter ZR; Brysbaert M; Knecht S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 19(8):1373-87. PubMed ID: 17651009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examination of the split fovea theory in a case of pure left hemialexia.
    Siéroff E; Lavidor M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 24(3):243-59. PubMed ID: 18416490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW; Shillcock R; Bland T
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 12(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 11587895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affective priming of emotional pictures in parafoveal vision: left visual field advantage.
    Calvo MG; Avero P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 18405045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli.
    Long GM; Lyman BJ
    Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():151-62. PubMed ID: 3594087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.