These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1262797)
1. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. McClelland JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres. Jordan TR; Redwood M; Patching GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural Representation in Visual Word Form Area during Word Reading. Lu C; Li H; Fu R; Qu J; Yue Q; Mei L Neuroscience; 2021 Jan; 452():49-62. PubMed ID: 33212220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis. Krueger LE Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings: a reply to Krueger's comments. Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 528897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual identity and uncertainty in repetition blindness. Brill GA; Glass AL; Rashid H; Hussey E Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):409-49. PubMed ID: 18792718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords. Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A word-superiority effect in the presence of foveal load. Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG; Pinkham RS Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1311-9. PubMed ID: 9700807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous-matching task. Bruder GA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Feb; 4(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 627853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition thresholds as a function of word length. Richards LG; Heller FP Am J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 89(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 998810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words. Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Types and tokens in visual letter perception. Mozer MC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):287-303. PubMed ID: 2525600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Features versus redundancy: comments on Massaro, Venezky, and Taylor's "Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings". Krueger LE J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 528896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative for judging confusability of visual letters. Thorson G Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 1256962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue. Solman RT Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition. Richardson JT Br J Psychol; 1976 Aug; 67(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 974448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect. Solman RT Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]