138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12629600)
1. The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty.
Patel JV; Masonis JL; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 12629600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
Erdemli B
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Sadri H; Pfander G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Koch P; Fujita H; Ballmer P; Ganz R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):869-77. PubMed ID: 18347806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular components without bulk bone graft in revision surgery: A 5- to 13-year follow-up study.
Ito H; Matsuno T; Aoki Y; Minami A
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 12629601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia.
Fan CY; Chen WM; Lee OK; Huang CK; Chiang CC; Chen TH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):809-13. PubMed ID: 17985149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cementless hemispheric acetabular component for acetabular revision arthroplasty: a 5- to 19-year follow-up study.
Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Kim KI; Chun SW; Cheng JQ
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 18358376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study.
Köster G; Rading S
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 May; 129(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18379799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cementless hemispheric hydroxyapatite-coated sockets for acetabular revision.
Geerdink CH; Schaafsma J; Meyers WG; Grimm B; Tonino AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 17400093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results.
Surdam JW; Archibeck MJ; Schultz SC; Junick DW; White RE
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17275634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs.
Aldinger PR; Thomsen M; Lukoschek M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Sep; 124(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 15241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.
Lee JM; Nam HT
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1057-60. PubMed ID: 21592720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50].
Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Slooff TJ; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1935-40. PubMed ID: 17907545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
