These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12629600)

  • 1. The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Patel JV; Masonis JL; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 12629600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Erdemli B
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Sadri H; Pfander G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Koch P; Fujita H; Ballmer P; Ganz R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):869-77. PubMed ID: 18347806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
    Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular components without bulk bone graft in revision surgery: A 5- to 13-year follow-up study.
    Ito H; Matsuno T; Aoki Y; Minami A
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 12629601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia.
    Fan CY; Chen WM; Lee OK; Huang CK; Chiang CC; Chen TH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):809-13. PubMed ID: 17985149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cementless hemispheric acetabular component for acetabular revision arthroplasty: a 5- to 19-year follow-up study.
    Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Kim KI; Chun SW; Cheng JQ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 18358376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study.
    Köster G; Rading S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 May; 129(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18379799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless hemispheric hydroxyapatite-coated sockets for acetabular revision.
    Geerdink CH; Schaafsma J; Meyers WG; Grimm B; Tonino AJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 17400093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results.
    Surdam JW; Archibeck MJ; Schultz SC; Junick DW; White RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17275634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs.
    Aldinger PR; Thomsen M; Lukoschek M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Sep; 124(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 15241616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
    Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Lee JM; Nam HT
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1057-60. PubMed ID: 21592720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50].
    Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Slooff TJ; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1935-40. PubMed ID: 17907545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.