328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12629774)
1. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
Fitzsimons NJ; Sun LL; Dahm P; Moul JW; Madden J; Gan TJ; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
May M; Dorst M; May J; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radical prostatectomy: comparison of the perineal and retropubic route (40 patients). Preliminary results].
Doublet JD; Lagrange L; Ciofu C; Thibault P; Gattegno B
Prog Urol; 1994 Feb; 4(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 8186791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Celioscopic lymphatic excision and perineal radical prostatectomy: a strategy for the treatment of prostatic cancer].
Melman A; Gladshteyn M; Stifelman M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 8508202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences among patients undergoing perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy in pain and perioperative variables: a prospective study.
Paiva CS; Andreoni C; Cunha GP; Khalil W; Ortiz V
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 19389007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
D'Alonzo RC; Gan TJ; Moul JW; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sun L; Dahm P; Habib AS
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Aug; 21(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 19700296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inguinal hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach.
Matsubara A; Yoneda T; Nakamoto T; Maruyama S; Koda S; Goto K; Teishima J; Shiina H; Igawa M; Usui T
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 18158037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical perineal prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer in obese and nonobese patients: a matched control study.
Yang BK; Gan TJ; Salmen CR; Cancel QV; Vieweg J; Dahm P
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):990-5. PubMed ID: 16635511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
