These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12630742)

  • 61. Numerical simulation of the dependence of quantitative ultrasonic parameters on trabecular bone microarchitecture and elastic constants.
    Haïat G; Padilla F; Barkmann R; Gluer CC; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e289-94. PubMed ID: 16859726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Efficient multi-modal dense field non-rigid registration: alignment of histological and section images.
    du Bois d'Aische A; Craene MD; Geets X; Gregoire V; Macq B; Warfield SK
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):538-46. PubMed ID: 15897000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Image-based variational meshing.
    Goksel O; Salcudean SE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jan; 30(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20601308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Retrospective evaluation of a topology preserving non-rigid registration method.
    Noblet V; Heinrich C; Heitz F; Armspach JP
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Jun; 10(3):366-84. PubMed ID: 16497537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A method for assessing voxel correspondence in longitudinal tumor imaging.
    Hoisak JD; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2742-53. PubMed ID: 21776811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. PET-MR image fusion in soft tissue sarcoma: accuracy, reliability and practicality of interactive point-based and automated mutual information techniques.
    Somer EJ; Marsden PK; Benatar NA; Goodey J; O'Doherty MJ; Smith MA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 12483410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A novel performance descriptor for ultrasonic strain imaging: a preliminary study.
    Jiang J; Hall TJ; Sommer AM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jun; 53(6):1088-102. PubMed ID: 16846142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.
    Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M; Insana M
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2003; 5():57-78. PubMed ID: 12704084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Estimation of nonlinear mechanical properties of vascular tissues via elastography.
    Karimi R; Zhu T; Bouma BE; Mofrad MR
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Dec; 8(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 19048372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Quasi-static magnetic resonance elastography at 7 T to measure the effect of pathology before and after fixation on tissue biomechanical properties.
    McGrath DM; Foltz WD; Al-Mayah A; Niu CJ; Brock KK
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jul; 68(1):152-65. PubMed ID: 22213551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Use and uncertainties of mutual information for computed tomography/ magnetic resonance (CT/MR) registration post permanent implant of the prostate.
    Roberson PL; McLaughlin PW; Narayana V; Troyer S; Hixson GV; Kessler ML
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 15789594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Determination of the elasticity parameters of brain tissue with combined simulation and registration.
    Soza G; Grosso R; Nimsky C; Hastreiter P; Fahlbusch R; Greiner G
    Int J Med Robot; 2005 Sep; 1(3):87-95. PubMed ID: 17518395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. In Vivo response to compression of 35 breast lesions observed with a two-dimensional locally regularized strain estimation method.
    Brusseau E; Detti V; Coulon A; Maissiat E; Boublay N; Berthezène Y; Fromageau J; Bush N; Bamber J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):300-12. PubMed ID: 24315397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Assessing image quality in effective Poisson's ratio elastography and poroelastography: II.
    Righetti R; Ophir J; Kumar AT; Krouskop TA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1321-33. PubMed ID: 17301457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.
    Manduca A; Oliphant TE; Dresner MA; Mahowald JL; Kruse SA; Amromin E; Felmlee JP; Greenleaf JF; Ehman RL
    Med Image Anal; 2001 Dec; 5(4):237-54. PubMed ID: 11731304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Efficient finite element methods for deformable bodies in medical applications.
    Georgii J; Dick C
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2012; 40(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 22668240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Truth cube: establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation.
    Kerdok AE; Cotin SM; Ottensmeyer MP; Galea AM; Howe RD; Dawson SL
    Med Image Anal; 2003 Sep; 7(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12946469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction.
    Van Houten EE; Paulsen KD; Miga MI; Kennedy FE; Weaver JB
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Oct; 42(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 10502768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Validation framework of the finite element modeling of liver tissue.
    Shi H; Fahmi R; Farag AA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):531-8. PubMed ID: 16685887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.