116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12634641)
1. A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 12634641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.
Ameye L; Valentin L; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19090501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):841-8. PubMed ID: 11503920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing clinical performance of gynecology residents: sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses based on morphological scoring systems.
Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB; Lee HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):776-9. PubMed ID: 16308902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of small adnexal masses based on morphologic characteristics of transvaginal sonographic imaging: a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Lissoni AA; Dordoni D; Trio D; Redaelli L; Rusconi C; Sanpaolo P; Floriani I; Torri V; Zaglio S; Valcamonico A; Piol F; Berlanda N; Zanetta G
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1467-73; quiz 1475-6. PubMed ID: 16239647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian crescent sign and sonomorphological indices in preoperative determination of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Kalghatgi-Kulkarni K; Kushtagi P
Indian J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 62(12):477-83. PubMed ID: 19265241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of ADNEX MR SCORING system: a single-centre retrospective study.
Sasaguri K; Yamaguchi K; Nakazono T; Mizuguchi M; Aishima S; Yokoyama M; Irie H
Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb; 74(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 30514585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Power Doppler Index for preoperative ovarian tumors discrimination].
Marret H; Vinatier L; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 17540606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gray-scale ultrasound versus CA-125 levels for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Guerriero S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 114(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 21696727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic Doppler.
Levine D
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1999 Aug; 20(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 10457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Barros RHO; Baião AC; Parente DB; Derchain S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sonographic characterization, Doppler ultrasonography and tumor markers in the diagnosis of malignancy of ovarian masses].
Gramellini D; Rutolo S; Verrotti C; Piantelli G; Fieni S; Vadora E
Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11279390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
