116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12634641)
21. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is three-dimensional ultrasonography of additional value in the assessment of adnexal masses?
Geomini PM; Coppus SF; Kluivers KB; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 17493667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of adnexal masses using three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology: preliminary report.
Chan L; Lin WM; Uerpairojkit B; Hartman D; Reece EA; Helm W
J Ultrasound Med; 1997 May; 16(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 9315174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer.
Alcázar JL; Castillo G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):807-12. PubMed ID: 15746675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic formula for the differentiation of adnexal tumors by transvaginal sonography.
Prömpeler HJ; Madjar H; Sauerbrei W; Lattermann U; Pfleiderer A
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 9052599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Zanetta G; Dordoni D; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Lissoni AA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9339526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Aubert E; Rockall A; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Rouzier R; Daraï E; Bazot M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new scoring model for characterization of adnexal masses based on two-dimensional gray-scale and colour Doppler sonographic features.
Abbas AM; Zahran KM; Nasr A; Kamel HS
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2014; 6(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 25009729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Soualhi N; Balvay D; Darai E; Cuenod CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A prospective evaluation of transvaginal sonography for detection of ovarian disease.
DiSantis DJ; Scatarige JC; Kemp G; Given FT; Hsiu JG; Cramer MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 8517330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
