These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12636059)
1. On-line monitoring equipment for wastewater treatment processes: state of the art. Vanrolleghem PA; Lee DS Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):1-34. PubMed ID: 12636059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of ion-sensitive sensors in water quality monitoring. Winkler S; Rieger L; Saracevic E; Pressl A; Gruber G Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):105-14. PubMed ID: 15685986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An integrated system to remote monitor and control anaerobic wastewater treatment plants through the internet. Bernard O; Chachuat B; Hélias A; Le Dantec B; Sialve B; Steyer JP; Lardon L; Neveu P; Lambert S; Gallop J; Dixon M; Ratini P; Quintabà A; Frattesi S; Lema JM; Roca E; Ruiz G; Rodriguez J; Franco A; Vanrolleghem P; Zaher U; De Pauw DJ; De Neve K; Lievens K; Dochaine D; Schoefs O; Fibrianto H; Farina R; Alcaraz Gonzalez V; Gonzalez Alvarez V; Lemaire P; Martinez JA; Esandi F; Duclaud O; Lavigne JF Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):457-64. PubMed ID: 16180464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved nutrient removal using in situ continuous on-line sensors with short response time. Ingildsen P; Wendelboe H Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 12926625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: fault detection and isolation. Steyer JP; Genovesi A; Harmand J Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):183-90. PubMed ID: 11385845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic evaluation of a fixed bed anaerobic digestion process in response to organic overloads and toxicant shock loads. Dupla M; Conte T; Bouvier JC; Bernet N; Steyer JP Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 14979539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nutrient minimisation in the pulp and paper industry: an overview. Slade AH; Ellis RJ; vanden Heuvel M; Stuthridge TR Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):111-22. PubMed ID: 15461405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling. Corominas LL; Rieger L; Takács I; Ekama G; Hauduc H; Vanrolleghem PA; Oehmen A; Gernaey KV; van Loosdrecht MC; Comeau Y Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):841-57. PubMed ID: 20182062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant. Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaerobic treatment of textile dyeing wastewater. Stern SR; Szpyrkowicz L; Rodighiero I Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(10):55-9. PubMed ID: 12862217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ UV monitoring of wastewater: a response to sample aging. Baurès E; Berho C; Pouet MF; Thomas O Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 14979537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated environmental assessment of tertiary and residuals treatment--LCA in the wastewater industry. Beavis P; Lundie S Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):109-16. PubMed ID: 12793669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and implementation of model based control strategies at an industrial wastewater treatment plant. Demey D; Vanderhaegen B; Vanhooren H; Liessens J; Van Eyck L; Hopkins L; Vanrolleghem PA Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):145-53. PubMed ID: 11547977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal. Ferrer J; Morenilla JJ; Bouzas A; García-Usach F Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):87-94. PubMed ID: 15536994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploiting online in-situ ammonium, nitrate and phosphate sensors in full-scale wastewater plant operation. Ingildsen P; Olsson G Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):139-47. PubMed ID: 12361002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs. Wichern M; Lübken M; Blömer R; Rosenwinkel KH Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):211-8. PubMed ID: 12906292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On-line measurement data of wastewater systems via WAP mobile phones. Alex J; Jumar U; Schütze M Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12636081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous monitoring in sewer networks an approach for quantification of pollution loads from CSOs into surface water bodies. Gruber G; Winkler S; Pressl A Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):215-23. PubMed ID: 16477989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking of control strategies for ATAD technology: a first approach to the automatic control of sludge treatment systems. Zambrano JA; Gil-Martinez M; Garcia-Sanz M; Irizar I Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19633383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Process control automation and remote on-line supervision: the strategy for wastewater treatment in an Italian piedmont. Battistoni EM; Fatone F; Pavan P; Beltritti R; Raviola M Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1571-7. PubMed ID: 18520014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]