These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12636068)

  • 1. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification.
    Rieger L; Alex J; Winkler S; Boehler M; Thomann M; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12636068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part II: results from a simulation benchmark study.
    Alex J; Rieger L; Winkler S; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12636069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the uncertainty of on-line sensors at WWTPs during field operation.
    Rieger L; Thomann M; Gujer W; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5162-74. PubMed ID: 16298416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of ion-sensitive sensors in water quality monitoring.
    Winkler S; Rieger L; Saracevic E; Pressl A; Gruber G
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):105-14. PubMed ID: 15685986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
    Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line estimation and detection of abnormal substrate concentrations in WWTPs using a software sensor: a benchmark study.
    Benazzi F; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U; Katebi R
    Environ Technol; 2007 Aug; 28(8):871-82. PubMed ID: 17879846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A software nitrate sensor based on ammonium and redox signals.
    Cecil D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):259-65. PubMed ID: 14753545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-contact measurement of wastewater polluting load--the Loadmon project.
    Russell SL; Marshallsay DR; MacCraith B; Devisscher M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 12636065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. System analysis for optimal control of a wastewater treatment benchmark.
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J; Zec M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):199-206. PubMed ID: 11385848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biosensors for marine applications. We all need the sea, but does the sea need biosensors?
    Kröger S; Law RJ
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Apr; 20(10):1903-13. PubMed ID: 15741057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated sensor for the monitoring of aerobic and anoxic activated sludge activities in biological nitrogen removal plants.
    Sin G; Malisse K; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 12636073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term evaluation of a spectral sensor for nitrite and nitrate.
    Rieger L; Vanrolleghem PA; Langergraber G; Kaelin D; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1563-9. PubMed ID: 18520013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental fate of Triclosan in the River Aire Basin, UK.
    Sabaliunas D; Webb SF; Hauk A; Jacob M; Eckhoff WS
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3145-54. PubMed ID: 14509701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction between control and design of a SHARON reactor: economic considerations in a plant-wide (BSM2) context.
    Volcke EI; van Loosdrecht MC; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):117-25. PubMed ID: 18025739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line load monitoring of wastewaters with a respirographic microbial sensor.
    Vaiopoulou E; Melidis P; Kampragou E; Aivasidis A
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Aug; 21(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16023964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microelectrode array sensor for water quality monitoring.
    Gobet J; Rychen P; Cardot F; Santoli E
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 12636071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarking of control strategies for ATAD technology: a first approach to the automatic control of sludge treatment systems.
    Zambrano JA; Gil-Martinez M; Garcia-Sanz M; Irizar I
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19633383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.