These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12636069)

  • 1. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part II: results from a simulation benchmark study.
    Alex J; Rieger L; Winkler S; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12636069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification.
    Rieger L; Alex J; Winkler S; Boehler M; Thomann M; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12636068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking of control strategies for ATAD technology: a first approach to the automatic control of sludge treatment systems.
    Zambrano JA; Gil-Martinez M; Garcia-Sanz M; Irizar I
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19633383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process: a simulation study.
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Carlsson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):19-26. PubMed ID: 12926665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedforward-feedback control of dissolved oxygen concentration in a predenitrification system.
    Yong M; Yongzhen P; Shuying W
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Jul; 27(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15900439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data-based modelling and proportional-integral-plus (pip) control of nitrate in an activated sludge benchmark.
    Ghavipanjeh F; Taylor CJ; Young PC; Chotai A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 11496682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BSM2 Plant-Wide Model construction and comparative analysis with other methodologies for integrated modelling.
    Grau P; Vanrolleghem P; Ayesa E
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):57-65. PubMed ID: 17978433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of the aeration volume in an activated sludge process using supervisory control strategies.
    Ekman M; Björlenius B; Andersson M
    Water Res; 2006 May; 40(8):1668-76. PubMed ID: 16597456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple fiber-optic-based sensors for process monitoring: an application in wine quality control monitoring.
    Noiseux I; Long W; Cournoyer A; Vernon M
    Appl Spectrosc; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1010-9. PubMed ID: 15324509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fuzzy-control for improved nitrogen removal and energy saving in WWT-plants with pre-denitrification.
    Meyer U; Pöpel HJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):69-76. PubMed ID: 12906273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved design and optimization of aeration control for WWTPs by dynamic simulation.
    Alex J; To TB; Hartwig P
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):365-72. PubMed ID: 11936654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
    Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MIMO variable structure controller design for a bioreactor benchmark process.
    Efe MO
    ISA Trans; 2007 Oct; 46(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 17521653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online estimation of wastewater nitrifiable nitrogen, nitrification and denitrification rates, using ORP and DO dynamics.
    Spérandio M; Queinnec I
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 14979535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gas sensing in microplates with optodes: influence of oxygen exchange between sample, air, and plate material.
    Arain S; Weiss S; Heinzle E; John GT; Krause C; Klimant I
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 15772950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.