These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637234)

  • 21. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
    Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fit-testing for firefighters.
    Brickman CP
    Occup Health Saf; 1999 Jan; 68(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 9891408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of exhalation valves.
    Kuo YM; Lai CY; Chen CC; Lu BH; Huang SH; Chen CW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Oct; 49(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 15716314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.
    Zhuang Z; Bradtmiller B; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):647-59. PubMed ID: 17613722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of strapped spectacles on the fit factors of three manufactured brands of full facepiece negative pressure respirators.
    Spear TM; Hardgrove R; Norman JB; Wulf DT; Rossi RJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Apr; 43(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 10366899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulated workplace performance of N95 respirators.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 10529991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity and specificity of the user-seal-check in determining the fit of N95 respirators.
    Lam SC; Lee JK; Yau SY; Charm CY
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Mar; 77(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 21236516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of a full facepiece, air-purifying respirator against lead aerosols in a workplace environment.
    Janssen L; Bidwell J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17175515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does training in performing a fit check enhance N95 respirator efficacy?
    Or P; Chung J; Wong T
    Workplace Health Saf; 2012 Dec; 60(12):511-5. PubMed ID: 23210700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using half-facepiece respirators for H1N1.
    Larson S
    Occup Health Saf; 2009 Nov; 78(11):22, 24. PubMed ID: 19927872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Particulate face masks for protection against airborne pathogens - one size does not fit all: an observational study.
    Winter S; Thomas JH; Stephens DP; Davis JS
    Crit Care Resusc; 2010 Mar; 12(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 20196710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of facial hair on the face seal of negative-pressure respirators.
    Skretvedt OT; Loschiavo JG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jan; 45(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 6702601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
    Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Protective performance and subjective evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators].
    Jiang LM; Yu YY; Rong Y; Cui XQ; Wang XY; Lu W; Tao Y; Chen WH
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 31(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 24064118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Duling MG; Campbell DL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jan; 3(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16485349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the user seal check on gross leakage detection of 3 different designs of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Lam SC; Lui AK; Lee LY; Lee JK; Wong KF; Lee CN
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 May; 44(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 26831273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of leak location on measured respirator fit.
    Crutchfield CD; Park DL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 9183835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A feasibility study of quantitative respirator fit testing by controlled negative pressure.
    Crutchfield CD; Eroh MP; Van Ert MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Apr; 52(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 2069125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.