These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637425)

  • 21. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface coating to improve the metal-cement bonding in cemented femur stems.
    Mumme T; Marx R; Müller-Rath R; Siebert CH; Wirtz DC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 17909822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhanced strength in cemented stem fixation using adhesive acrylic cement as a metal coating material.
    Morita S; Yamamoto H; Furuya K; Ishihara K; Nakabayashi N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Feb; 34(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 9029296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in-vitro investigation into the cement pressurization achieved during insertion of four different femoral stems.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Nov; 219(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 16312100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monitoring the integrity of the cement-metal interface of total joint components in vitro using acoustic emission and ultrasound.
    Davies JP; Tse MK; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 8872581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength analysis of the bone cement- stem interface of hip arthroplasties.
    Zhang LF; Ge SR; Liu HT; Guo KJ; Han SY; Qi JY
    Asian Pac J Trop Med; 2014 Feb; 7(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of bone porosity on the shear strength of the bone-cement interface.
    Amirfeyz R; Bannister G
    Int Orthop; 2009 Jun; 33(3):843-6. PubMed ID: 18437380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Salentiny Y; Zwicky L; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Oct; 138(10):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 30046893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].
    Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface pretreatment for prolonged survival of cemented tibial prosthesis components: full- vs. surface-cementation technique.
    Marx R; Qunaibi M; Wirtz DC; Niethard FU; Mumme T
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():61. PubMed ID: 16262888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of increasing temperature on the properties of four bone cements.
    Parks ML; Walsh HA; Salvati EA; Li S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):238-48. PubMed ID: 9917609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.
    Zhang H; Brown L; Blunt L
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Feb; 19(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 17619954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of long-term physiological activity on the long-term stem stability of cemented hip arthroplasty: in vitro comparison of three commercial bone cements.
    Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Cristofolini L; Erani P; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 20225457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.