248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637746)
1. Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon.
Heath DD; Heath JW; Bryden CA; Johnson RM; Fox CW
Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5613):1738-40. PubMed ID: 12637746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comment on "rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon".
Beacham TD
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5642):59; discussion 59. PubMed ID: 14526063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comment on "rapid evolution of egg size in captive Salmon".
Fleming IA; Einum S; Jonsson B; Jonsson N
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5642):59; discussion 59. PubMed ID: 14526064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments.
Ford MJ; Hard JJ; Boelts B; LaHood E; Miller J
Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):783-94. PubMed ID: 18577092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process.
Quinn TP; Kinnison MT; Unwin MJ
Genetica; 2001; 112-113():493-513. PubMed ID: 11838785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.
Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon.
Naish KA; Taylor JE; Levin PS; Quinn TP; Winton JR; Huppert D; Hilborn R
Adv Mar Biol; 2007; 53():61-194. PubMed ID: 17936136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon.
Hendry AP
Genetica; 2001; 112-113():515-34. PubMed ID: 11838786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.
Frankham R
Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):325-33. PubMed ID: 18173504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating alternative strategies for minimizing unintended fitness consequences of cultured individuals on wild populations.
Baskett ML; Waples RS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 23082984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success.
van Oosterhout C; Smith AM; Hänfling B; Ramnarine IW; Mohammed RS; Cable J
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1573-83. PubMed ID: 18173481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales.
Conover DO; Munch SB
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):94-6. PubMed ID: 12098697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.
Araki H; Cooper B; Blouin MS
Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5847):100-3. PubMed ID: 17916734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unravelling first-generation pedigrees in wild endangered salmon populations using molecular genetic markers.
Herbinger CM; O'reilly PT; Verspoor E
Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2261-75. PubMed ID: 16780439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations.
Koskinen MT; Haugen TO; Primmer CR
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):826-30. PubMed ID: 12397355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent natural and sexual selection in wild male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka.
Hamon TR; Foote CJ
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1104-18. PubMed ID: 16136808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conservation biology. Rapid evolution can foil even the best-laid plans.
Zimmer C
Science; 2003 May; 300(5621):895. PubMed ID: 12738833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lake-specific variation in growth, migration timing and survival of juvenile sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka: separating environmental from genetic influences.
Reed TE; Martinek G; Quinn TP
J Fish Biol; 2010 Aug; 77(3):692-705. PubMed ID: 20701648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supportive breeding boosts natural population abundance with minimal negative impacts on fitness of a wild population of Chinook salmon.
Hess MA; Rabe CD; Vogel JL; Stephenson JJ; Nelson DD; Narum SR
Mol Ecol; 2012 Nov; 21(21):5236-50. PubMed ID: 23025818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians.
Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 18616746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
