BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637836)

  • 1. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function.
    Hunt OA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 87(12):1504-8. PubMed ID: 14660462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).
    Choi M; Weiss S; Schaeffel F; Seidemann A; Howland HC; Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):537-48. PubMed ID: 11100892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and Validity of Peripheral Refraction with Two Different Autorefractors.
    Morrison AM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):429-439. PubMed ID: 32511165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 9255823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
    Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults: an update.
    Mallen EA; Gilmartin B; Wolffsohn JS; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 26497294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PowerRefractor versus Canon R-50 Autorefraction to assess refractive error in children: a community-based study in ecuador.
    Virgili G; Angi M; Heede S; Rodriguez D; Bottega E; Molinari A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17299345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
    J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Salmon TO; West RW; Gasser W; Kenmore T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 12553539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
    Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
    Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Humphrey Vision Analyzer tm: reliability and validity of refractive-error measures.
    Kratz LD; Flom MC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Oct; 54(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 605920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.