These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637900)

  • 1. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome.
    Kim JC; Mascarenhas AK; Joo BH; Vig KW; Beck FM; Vig PS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 11113798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological parameters as predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Doll GM; Peylo SM
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 11544788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
    Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors for Class II treatment duration.
    Popowich K; Nebbe B; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15775943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postretention assessment of deep overbite correction in Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Kim TW; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 10227559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions.
    Artun J; Garol JD; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 8805919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.