177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12637900)
1. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome.
Kim JC; Mascarenhas AK; Joo BH; Vig KW; Beck FM; Vig PS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 11113798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphological parameters as predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusion.
Zentner A; Doll GM; Peylo SM
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 11544788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors for Class II treatment duration.
Popowich K; Nebbe B; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15775943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postretention assessment of deep overbite correction in Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
Kim TW; Little RM
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 10227559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions.
Artun J; Garol JD; Little RM
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 8805919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
