BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12638705)

  • 1. The effect of metal ions on humic acid removal and permeation properties in an ultrafiltration system.
    Hsu CS; Chen SH; Liou RM; Hung MY; Yu KC
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003 Feb; 38(2):415-28. PubMed ID: 12638705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of extreme concentrations of hydrophilic pore-former on reinforced polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for reduction of humic acid fouling.
    Son M; Kim H; Jung J; Jo S; Choi H
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():194-201. PubMed ID: 28365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of humic acid foulant from ultrafiltration membrane surface using photocatalytic oxidation process.
    Fang H; Sun DD; Wu M; Phay W; Tay JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):373-80. PubMed ID: 16003999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the effect of solution environment on humic acid removal behavior with charged and traditional neutral ultrafiltration membranes].
    Hou J; Shao JH; He YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1518-24. PubMed ID: 20698266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of biochar-ultrafiltration membrane processes for humic acid removal under various hydrodynamic, pH, ionic strength, and pressure conditions.
    Shankar V; Heo J; Al-Hamadani YAJ; Park CM; Chu KH; Yoon Y
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():610-618. PubMed ID: 28432886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane.
    Chang H; Liu B; Liang H; Yu H; Shao S; Li G
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():254-264. PubMed ID: 28371709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on the efficiency of ultrafiltration technology in dealing with sudden cadmium pollution in surface water and ultrafiltration membrane fouling.
    Meng Q; Nan J; Wang Z; Ji X; Wu F; Liu B; Xiao Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(16):16641-16651. PubMed ID: 30989604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling resistant functional blend membrane for removal of organic matter and heavy metal ions.
    Lavanya C; Balakrishna RG; Soontarapa K; Padaki MS
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():372-381. PubMed ID: 30496967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a better hydraulic cleaning strategy for ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: Effect of backwash water composition.
    Chang H; Liang H; Qu F; Ma J; Ren N; Li G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():177-186. PubMed ID: 27155423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism.
    Wang J; Wang XC
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(5):880-4. PubMed ID: 17278741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple dynamic Al-based floc layers on ultrafiltration membrane surfaces for humic acid and reservoir water fouling reduction.
    Ma B; Li W; Liu R; Liu G; Sun J; Liu H; Qu J; van der Meer W
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():291-300. PubMed ID: 29656194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY; Watanabe Y; Minegishi S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of UF membrane fouling mechanisms caused by organic interactions in seawater.
    Resosudarmo A; Ye Y; Le-Clech P; Chen V
    Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):911-21. PubMed ID: 23219388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Purification Efficiency and Mechanism of Integrated Al Salt Floc-ultrafiltration Membrane Process].
    Xue WJ; Li WJ; Liu J; Ma BW
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2019 Feb; 40(2):730-737. PubMed ID: 30628337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.
    Yu W; Liu T; Crawshaw J; Liu T; Graham N
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():353-362. PubMed ID: 29665507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Titanium tetrachloride for silver nanoparticle-humic acid composite contaminant removal in coagulation-ultrafiltration hybrid process: floc property and membrane fouling.
    Zhao Y; Sun Y; Tian C; Gao B; Wang Y; Shon H; Yang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(2):1757-1768. PubMed ID: 27796984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of metal ions and humic acid on the dechlorination of tetrachloroethylene by zerovalent iron.
    Doong RA; Lai YL
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jun; 64(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 16466778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Custom-made PEI/exfoliated-MoS
    Saraswathi MSSA; Rana D; Nagendran A; Alwarappan S
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Feb; 83():108-114. PubMed ID: 29208267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.