149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12639001)
1. Phenotypic population characteristics of the enterococci in wastewater and animal faeces: implications for the new European directive on the quality of bathing waters.
Wallis JL; Taylor HD
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):27-32. PubMed ID: 12639001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
Fujioka RS
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial source tracking: a forensic technique for microbial source identification?
Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Kay D; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Walters M; Gawler A; Hindle T
J Environ Monit; 2007 May; 9(5):427-39. PubMed ID: 17492088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population similarity analysis of indicator bacteria for source prediction of faecal pollution in a coastal lake.
Ahmed W; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A; Katouli M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Aug; 56(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 18561957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking the origin of faecal pollution in surface water: an ongoing project within the European Union research programme.
Blanch AR; Belanche-Muñoz L; Bonjoch X; Ebdon J; Gantzer C; Lucena F; Ottoson J; Kourtis C; Iversen A; Kühn I; Moce L; Muniesa M; Schwartzbrod J; Skraber S; Papageorgiou G; Taylor HD; Wallis J; Jofre J
J Water Health; 2004 Dec; 2(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 15666966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of mussels as biosamplers for characterization of faecal pollution in coastal recreational waters.
Roslev P; Bukh AS; Iversen L; Sønderbo H; Iversen N
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):586-93. PubMed ID: 20706005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abundance and characteristics of the recreational water quality indicator bacteria Escherichia coli and enterococci in gull faeces.
Fogarty LR; Haack SK; Wolcott MJ; Whitman RL
J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 94(5):865-78. PubMed ID: 12694452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenotypic variations of enterococci in surface waters: analysis of biochemical fingerprinting data from multi-catchments.
Ahmed W; Katouli M
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 105(2):452-8. PubMed ID: 18298525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a novel amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing method for enterococci isolates from cattle faeces and evaluation of the single versus pooled faecal sampling approach.
Burtscher MM; Köllner KE; Sommer R; Keiblinger K; Farnleitner AH; Mach RL
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 16828184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The application of a recently isolated strain of Bacteroides (GB-124) to identify human sources of faecal pollution in a temperate river catchment.
Ebdon J; Muniesa M; Taylor H
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3683-90. PubMed ID: 17275065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simplified low-cost approach to antibiotic resistance profiling for faecal source tracking.
Ebdon JE; Wallis JL; Taylor HD
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 15318507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing relative release kinetics of faecal indicator organisms from different faecal matrices.
Hodgson CJ; Bulmer N; Chadwick DR; Oliver DM; Heathwaite AL; Fish RD; Winter M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 49(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19422475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of diffuse and point source microbial pollution in the ribble catchment discharging to bathing waters in the north west of England.
Wither A; Greaves J; Dunhill I; Wyer M; Stapleton C; Kay D; Humphrey N; Watkins J; Francis C; McDonald A; Crowther J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):191-8. PubMed ID: 15850190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential use of a host associated molecular marker in Enterococcus faecium as an index of human fecal pollution.
Scott TM; Jenkins TM; Lukasik J; Rose JB
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jan; 39(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 15667106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of enterococcal surface protein genes as markers of sewage contamination in tropical recreational waters.
Betancourt WQ; Fujioka RS
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):261-6. PubMed ID: 19587423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and source identification of faecal pollution in non-sewered catchment by means of host-specific molecular markers.
Ahmed W; Powell D; Goonetilleke A; Gardner T
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):579-86. PubMed ID: 18725724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the importance of faecal sources in human-impacted waters.
Schoen ME; Soller JA; Ashbolt NJ
Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(8):2670-80. PubMed ID: 21429551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
