These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12639055)

  • 1. Wind tunnel studies on spray deposition on leaves of tree species used for windbreaks and exposure of honey bees.
    Ucar T; Hall FR; Tew JE; Hacker JK
    Pest Manag Sci; 2003 Mar; 59(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 12639055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.
    Ucar T; Hall FR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2001 Aug; 57(8):663-75. PubMed ID: 11517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of ground-applied ultra-low-volume malathion on honey bee survival and productivity in open and forest areas.
    Hester PG; Shaffer KR; Tietze NS; Zhong H; Griggs NL
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Mar; 17(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11345413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual regulation of ground speed and headwind compensation in freely flying honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).
    Barron A; Srinivasan MV
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 5):978-84. PubMed ID: 16481586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
    De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland.
    Brown RB; Carter MH; Stephenson GR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15532682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of hedges on spray deposition and on the biological impact of pesticide spray drift.
    Davis BN; Brown MJ; Frost AJ; Yates TJ; Plant RA
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1994 Apr; 27(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 7519547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aerodynamic effects of trees on pollutant concentration in street canyons.
    Buccolieri R; Gromke C; Di Sabatino S; Ruck B
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Sep; 407(19):5247-56. PubMed ID: 19596394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wind tunnel evaluation of several tracer and collection techniques for the measurement of spray drift.
    Brusselman E; Van Driessen K; Steurbaut W; Gabriels D; Cornelis W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B; Baetens K; Nicolai B; Verboven P; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 15756877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's inhalation exposure to methamidophos from sprayed potato fields in Washington State: exploring the use of probabilistic modeling of meteorological data in exposure assessment.
    Ramaprasad J; Tsai MG; Fenske RA; Faustman EM; Griffith WC; Felsot AS; Elgethun K; Weppner S; Yost MG
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 19(6):613-23. PubMed ID: 18957992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.