These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12639531)

  • 1. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for studies of film-reading performance.
    Scally AJ; Brealey S
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Mar; 58(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 12639531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: a comparative plain film-reading performance study.
    Buskov L; Abild A; Christensen A; Holm O; Hansen C; Christensen H
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22935242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions.
    Pauli R; Hammond S; Cooke J; Ansell J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):10-4. PubMed ID: 8785616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accident and emergency and general practitioner plain radiograph reporting by radiographers and radiologists: a quasi-randomized controlled trial.
    Brealey S; King DG; Crowe MT; Crawshaw I; Ford L; Warnock NG; Mannion RA; Ethell S
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jan; 76(901):57-61. PubMed ID: 12595326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in plain film reading performance studies.
    Brealey S; Scally AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):307-16. PubMed ID: 11387147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can radiographers read screening mammograms?
    Wivell G; Denton ER; Eve CB; Inglis JC; Harvey I
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of UK radiographer image reading.
    Blakeley C; Hogg P; Heywood J
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 18203876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms.
    Taylor PM; Champness J; Given-Wilson RM; Potts HW; Johnston K
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jan; 77(913):21-7. PubMed ID: 14988134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative framework.
    Brealey S
    Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 11384129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of reporting speed on plain film reporting errors.
    Edwards AJ; Ricketts C; Dubbins PA; Roobottom CA; Wells IP
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):971-9. PubMed ID: 14654030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Nelemans PJ; Flobbe K
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 17764941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.
    Scott HJ; Gale AG
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17209118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of radiographers' plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice.
    Brealey S; Hewitt C; Scally A; Hahn S; Godfrey C; Thomas N
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 82(979):600-4. PubMed ID: 19153189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review article: methodological standards in radiographer plain film reading performance studies.
    Brealey S; Scally AJ; Thomas NB
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):107-13. PubMed ID: 11893633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of junior hospital doctors' interpretation of acute radiographs using an X-ray box and a window.
    Wright CH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Jan; 85(1):73. PubMed ID: 12585645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Film-reading ability of radiographers in detecting gastric cancer during screening using X-ray examination.
    Yatake H; Takeda Y; Katsuda T; Gotanda R; Yamazaki H; Kuroda C
    Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 27(8):291-6. PubMed ID: 19856223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of radiographer reporting of paediatric brain CT.
    Brandt A; Andronikou S; Wieselthaler N; Louw B; Kilborn T; Dekker G; Bertelsman J; Dreyer C
    Pediatr Radiol; 2007 Mar; 37(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 17268779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.
    Brealey S; Scally A; Hahn S; Thomas N; Godfrey C; Coomarasamy A
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15664578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How good are emergency department Senior House Officers at interpreting X-rays following radiographers' triage?
    Willis BH; Sur SD
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Feb; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 17198320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual and signal detection factors in radiography.
    Manning DJ; Leach J
    Ergonomics; 2002 Dec; 45(15):1103-16. PubMed ID: 12569045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.