325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12639655)
1. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Hsu EI; Hong EK; Lepor H
Urology; 2003 Mar; 61(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 12639655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?
Lee DK; Allareddy V; O'donnell MA; Williams RD; Konety BR
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 16336327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases.
Lepor H; Nieder AM; Ferrandino MN
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1729-33. PubMed ID: 11586211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary evaluation of operative parameters and complications related to open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lepor H; Kaci L
Urology; 2003 Oct; 62(4):702-6. PubMed ID: 14550447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.
Hatiboglu G; Teber D; Tichy D; Pahernik S; Hadaschik B; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hohenfellner M
World J Urol; 2016 Jan; 34(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 25991601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates.
Foley CL; Bott SR; Thomas K; Parkinson MC; Kirby RS
BJU Int; 2003 Sep; 92(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 12930421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.
Morgan MS; Shakir NA; Garcia-Gil M; Ozayar A; Gahan JC; Friedlander JI; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 24973046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
Haab F; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L; Toublanc M
Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 7530127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical perineal prostatectomy: An outdated procedure?
Comploj E; Palermo S; Trenti E; Martini T; Lodde M; Mian C; Mazzoleni G; Pycha A
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(5):400-3. PubMed ID: 21443972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of complications and results in a contemporary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies with the anatomic approach at a single institution.
Maffezzini M; Seveso M; Taverna G; Giusti G; Benetti A; Graziotti P
Urology; 2003 May; 61(5):982-6. PubMed ID: 12736020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
Parsons JK; Bennett JL
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 18267330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Chang CM; Moon D; Gianduzzo TR; Eden CG
Eur Urol; 2005 Aug; 48(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 15963634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Robotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve].
Mavrich Villavicencio H; Esquena S; Palou Redorta J; Gómez Ruíz JJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2007 Jun; 31(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 17896554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early and late complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy: experience in a single institution.
Hisasue S; Takahashi A; Kato R; Shimizu T; Masumori N; Itoh N; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 34(5):274-9. PubMed ID: 15231863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable.
Lepor H; Nieder AM; Fraiman MC
Urology; 2001 Sep; 58(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 11549493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical retropubic prostatectomy outcomes at a community hospital.
Gaylis FD; Friedel WE; Armas OA
J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 9400463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact and Predictive Value of Prostate Weight on the Outcomes of Nerve Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Jiang DG; Xiao CT; Mao YH; Qiu JG; Si-Tu J; Lu MH; Gao X
Urol J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):260-266. PubMed ID: 30206921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
