These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
891 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12640157)
1. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Okamoto Y; Tanaka YO; Nishida M; Tsunoda H; Yoshikawa H; Itai Y Radiographics; 2003; 23(2):425-45; quiz 534-5. PubMed ID: 12640157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Markedly high signal intensity lesions in the uterine cervix on T2-weighted imaging: differentiation between mucin-producing carcinomas and nabothian cysts. Li H; Sugimura K; Okizuka H; Yoshida M; Maruyama R; Takahashi K; Miyazaki K Radiat Med; 1999; 17(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10399782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. US of the Nongravid Cervix with Multimodality Imaging Correlation: Normal Appearance, Pathologic Conditions, and Diagnostic Pitfalls. Wildenberg JC; Yam BL; Langer JE; Jones LP Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):596-617. PubMed ID: 26963464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR findings of pseudoneoplastic lesions in the uterine cervix mimicking adenoma malignum. Sugiyama K; Takehara Y Br J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 80(959):878-83. PubMed ID: 17989332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep nabothian cysts of the uterine cervix. A possible source of confusion with minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma (adenoma malignum). Clement PB; Young RH Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1989; 8(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 2807713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of endocervical glandular disorders: three cases of a deep nabothian cyst and three cases of a minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma. Oguri H; Maeda N; Izumiya C; Kusume T; Yamamoto Y; Fukaya T Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1333-7. PubMed ID: 15607108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pseudoneoplastic glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. Young RH; Clement PB Semin Diagn Pathol; 1991 Nov; 8(4):234-49. PubMed ID: 1759058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones. Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Causes of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the normal uterine cervix]. Rouanet JP; Batch T; de Graef M; Karam R; Maubon A JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 12693378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Power Doppler findings of adenoma malignum of uterine cervix. Umesaki N; Nakai Y; Honda K; Kawamura N; Kanaoka Y; Nishimura S; Ishiko O; Ogita S Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1998; 45(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 9565150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma. Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Rabban JT; McAlhany S; Lerwill MF; Grenert JP; Zaloudek CJ Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Feb; 34(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20061933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of cervical pathology. Rezvani M; Shaaban A Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. Sala E; Wakely S; Senior E; Lomas D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jun; 188(6):1577-87. PubMed ID: 17515380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement. Iwata S; Joja I; Okuno K; Miyagi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Kudo T; Hiraki Y Radiat Med; 2002; 20(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 12450104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Yamashita Y; Baba T; Baba Y; Nishimura R; Ikeda S; Takahashi M; Ohtake H; Okamura H Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 10966715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]