These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12640989)

  • 1. [The governmental proposal on ethical review of research projects: manifestation of distrust concerning professional competence within universities and colleges].
    Zetterström R
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Feb; 100(7):537-8. PubMed ID: 12640989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In court: research subjects says institutional review boards (IRBs) must change research review.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):8. PubMed ID: 16789307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Ethical scrutiny of human research is regulated by law. Risks and benefits].
    Dahlquist G
    Lakartidningen; 2003 May; 100(22):1964-6. PubMed ID: 12833727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
    Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Retroactive ethical approval of the Gillberg study?].
    Koch MG
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Nov 14-20; 102(46):3485; author reply 3485. PubMed ID: 16335734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
    Borst-Eilers E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Verdicts by the administrative court of appeal cause research ethics dilemma].
    Wentz E
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Feb; 100(9):741. PubMed ID: 12674568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Editors' views concerning the proposal on ethical scrutiny of research].
    Zetterström R
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Aug; 99(32-33):3228. PubMed ID: 12219483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Research Ethics Committees--who is to represent the community?].
    Lynöe N; Höyer K; Mjörndal T; Olofsson BO
    Lakartidningen; 2003 May; 100(22):1987-8. PubMed ID: 12833731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee].
    Kamper-Jørgensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The long arm of administrative law: applying administrative law principles to research ethics boards.
    Hadskis M; Carver P
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):19-32. PubMed ID: 16459411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The regional ethical committees. Responsibilities and challenges].
    Fries AG; Nielsen DL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2341-2. PubMed ID: 15281572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting of ethical protection in recent oral and maxillofacial surgery research involving human subjects.
    Pitak-Arnnop P; Sader R; Hervé C; Dhanuthai K; Bertrand JC; Hemprich A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 19264449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
    Hoffman S
    Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When is research really research? Academic physicians push to keep oversight of most quality-improvement projects away from institutional review boards.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Nov; LI(14):A21. PubMed ID: 15675071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How not to rethink research ethics.
    Beauchamp TL
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.
    Garrard E; Dawson A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 15994364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.
    Aita M; Richer MC
    Nurs Health Sci; 2005 Jun; 7(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 15877688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.