These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12641383)

  • 21. Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth.
    Johnsen SE; Trulsson M
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Mar; 89(3):1478-87. PubMed ID: 12626623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of the sensor type on the measured impact absorption of mouthguard material.
    Takeda T; Ishigami K; Jun H; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Ogawa T
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 14998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of modal analysis to human subjects: comparison of healthy subjects and cleft lip and palate subjects.
    Du L; Suzuki R; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 1998 Mar; 45(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 12160244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material.
    Takeda T; Ishigami K; Shintaro K; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Regner CW
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 14998410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thickness and fit of mouthguards according to a vacuum-forming process.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Takahashi M
    Dent Traumatol; 2013 Aug; 29(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 23083298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shock absorption capacities of mouthguards in different types and thicknesses.
    Bemelmanns P; Pfeiffer P
    Int J Sports Med; 2001 Feb; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11281619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of commercially available mouthguards and a custom mouthguard.
    Guevara PH; Hondrum SO; Reichl RB
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 12016685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anterior palatal mouthguard margin location and its effect on shock-absorbing capability.
    Yamada J; Maeda Y; Satoh H; Miura J
    Dent Traumatol; 2006 Jun; 22(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 16643289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Periapical surgery in maxillary premolars and molars: analysis in terms of the distance between the lesion and the maxillary sinus.
    Garcia B; Penarrocha M; Martí E; Martínez JM; Gay-Escoda C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1212-7. PubMed ID: 18486786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The effect of mouthguard on strength of the musculus deltoideus].
    Zhang N; Wang Q; Pan K
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):348-50. PubMed ID: 11769647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of maxillary mouthguards on physiological parameters.
    Bourdin M; Brunet-Patru I; Hager PE; Allard Y; Hager JP; Lacour JR; Moyen B
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Aug; 38(8):1500-4. PubMed ID: 16888465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shock absorption ability of laminate mouth guards in two different malocclusions using fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor.
    Bhalla A; Grewal N; Tiwari U; Mishra V; Mehla NS; Raviprakash S; Kapur P
    Dent Traumatol; 2013 Jun; 29(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 22805585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are all mouthguards the same and safe to use? The influence of occlusal supporting mouthguards in decreasing bone distortion and fractures.
    Takeda T; Ishigami K; Ogawa T; Nakajima K; Shibusawa M; Shimada A; Regner CW
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 15144446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The rotation of maxillary first molars, mandibular first molars, and maxillary first premolars in acceptable occlusions.
    Hansen GK; Caruso JM; West V; Andreiko CA; Farrage JR; Jeiroudi MT
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 9528408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Study on cushioning and energy absorption of sports mouthguard].
    Bao SJ; Ye SJ; Ren XW; Chen QY; Wei B; Gong Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Feb; 30(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 33907780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Difference in vacuum-formed mouthguard thickness according to timing of vacuum application.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Takahashi M
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Aug; 32(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 26542181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Difference in pressure-formed mouthguard thickness according to the laminate procedure.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K
    Dent Traumatol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 31557381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing change in mouthguard thickness according to the thickness of the original mouthguard sheet.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Takahashi M
    Dent Traumatol; 2014 Dec; 30(6):468-71. PubMed ID: 24890333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Clinical study of ectopic eruption of the permanent first molars].
    Saijo K; Ogino C; Sasaki N; Saito F; Chiba H; Kamiyama K
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1990; 28(4):1093-103. PubMed ID: 2134124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.