These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12641960)

  • 1. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Three dimensional finite element stress analysis in various class II cavity design on first maxillary premolar].
    Sun Z; Xu X; Tao L; Xiong HG
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2002 Dec; 11(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 14983375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class 2 amalgam and composite restorations.
    Hunter AR; Treasure ET; Hunter AJ
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8700763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a reinforced slot design for CEREC system to restore extensively compromised premolars.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Chang WJ; Cheng MH
    J Dent; 2006 Mar; 34(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 16112335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strain profiles in molars restored with posterior composite resins: effect of cavity size & restorative technique.
    Kamel FM; Bides MW; Leinfelder KF
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1327-33. PubMed ID: 9497677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of effects on composite resin for filling in various cavity margin design].
    Xu X; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Sep; 34(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 11776892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Resistance recovery of prepared teeth obturated with different materials].
    Pérez Gutiérrez I; Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):686-90. PubMed ID: 2640099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of operators' skills on increase in cavity volume of restorations.
    Dörter C; Yildiz E; Erdemir U
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 12674355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cavity form on adhesion to cavity floor.
    Kishikawa R; Koiwa A; Chikawa H; Cho E; Inai N; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):311-4. PubMed ID: 16433397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strengthening of a model composite restoration using shape optimization: a numerical and experimental study.
    Li H; Yun X; Li J; Shi L; Fok AS; Madden MJ; Labuz JF
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 19818487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filling cavities or restoring teeth?
    Versluis A; Versluis-Tantbirojn D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):36-42; quiz 42-3. PubMed ID: 21748978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.