These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12643555)

  • 1. Performance change of mammographic CAD schemes optimized with most-recent and prior image databases.
    Zheng B; Good WF; Armfield DR; Cohen C; Hertzberg T; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Mar; 10(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12643555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images.
    Zheng B; Shah R; Wallace L; Hakim C; Ganott MA; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1245-50. PubMed ID: 12449356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments.
    Zheng B; Swensson RG; Golla S; Hakim CM; Shah R; Wallace L; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 15109012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
    Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms.
    Qian W; Song D; Lei M; Sankar R; Eikman E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 17434066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
    Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.
    Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Lederman D; Wang X; Gur D
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 85(1014):e153-61. PubMed ID: 21343322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
    Wang X; Li L; Liu W; Xu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):570-9. PubMed ID: 22234836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
    Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Good WF; Maitz GS; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Aug; 7(8):595-602. PubMed ID: 10952109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
    Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
    Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
    Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.
    Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081906. PubMed ID: 25086537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods.
    Zheng B; Tan J; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1338-47. PubMed ID: 19632867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.