These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions. Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting tether use and correct use in child restraint installations. Jermakian JS; Klinich KD; Orton NR; Flannagan CA; Manary MA; Malik LA; Narayanaswamy P J Safety Res; 2014 Dec; 51():99-108. PubMed ID: 25453183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of harness type on child restraint system misuse. Arbogast KB; Morris SD; Durbin DR; Winston FK Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2002; 46():261-9. PubMed ID: 12361512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts. Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():61-81. PubMed ID: 33636003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of harness fit for normal and low birthweight infants observed among newborns in infant car seats. Brown J; Sinn JK; Chua A; Clarke EC Inj Prev; 2017 Apr; 23(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27421745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of new legislation on child restraint system (CRS) misuse and inappropriate use in Australia. Koppel S; Charlton JL; Rudin-Brown CM Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 23531262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation of child restraint/seatbelt usage in motor vehicles by Maori in Northland New Zealand. Brewin M; Peters T Inj Prev; 2003 Mar; 9(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 12642567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations. Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Baker GH; Bolte JH Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):534-539. PubMed ID: 31194584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Car occupant restraint use in Fife: an observational study. Baijal E; Carter H; Davie A Public Health; 1993 Jan; 107(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8475242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of child safety seats vs seat belts in reducing risk for death in children in passenger vehicle crashes. Elliott MR; Kallan MJ; Durbin DR; Winston FK Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2006 Jun; 160(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 16754824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles. Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vehicle characteristics associated with LATCH use and correct use in real-world child restraint installations. Cicchino JB; Jermakian JS J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():77-85. PubMed ID: 25934000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety. Skjerven-Martinsen ; Naess PA; Hansen TB; Staff T; Stray-Pedersen A Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():479-86. PubMed ID: 23954682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]