These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12644716)

  • 21. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of histamine and methacholine bronchial challenges using the DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer and the Rosenthal-French dosimeter.
    Bennett JB; Davies RJ
    Br J Dis Chest; 1987 Jul; 81(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 3311118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Wanger J; Cockcroft DW; Culver BH; ; Diamant Z; Gauvreau G; Hall GL; Hallstrand TS; Horvath I; de Jongh FHC; Joos G; Kaminsky DA; Laube BL; Leuppi JD; Sterk PJ
    Eur Respir J; 2017 May; 49(5):. PubMed ID: 28461290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1).
    Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2000 Mar; 117(3):881-3. PubMed ID: 10713019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.
    Schulze J; Rosewich M; Riemer C; Dressler M; Rose MA; Zielen S
    Respir Med; 2009 Dec; 103(12):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19596563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods.
    Wubbel C; Asmus MJ; Stevens G; Chesrown SE; Hendeles L
    Chest; 2004 Feb; 125(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 14769724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Non-allergenic bronchial hyperreactivity. Measurement methods and reproducibility].
    Boulet LP; Denjean A
    Rev Mal Respir; 1994; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 8202607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
    Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increased bronchial responsiveness to histamine associated with shortened inhalation time.
    Vázquez C; Rodríguez-Soriano J
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 1989; 6(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 2927976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breathing pattern variability during bronchial histamine and methacholine challenges in asthmatics.
    Strömberg NO; Gustafsson PM
    Respir Med; 1996 May; 90(5):287-96. PubMed ID: 9499813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methacholine challenge test: Comparison of tidal breathing and dosimeter methods in children.
    Mazi A; Lands LC; Zielinski D
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 29178471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.
    Khan YR; McDonough P; Cockcroft DW; David BE; Hendeles L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Oct; 116(4):924-6. PubMed ID: 16210072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Oct; 10(10):2436-7. PubMed ID: 9387980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Bates SL; Doyle CC
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12556261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of airway conductance and FEV(1) as measures of airway responsiveness to methacholine. Discrimination of small differences in bronchial responsiveness with Gaw and FEV(1).
    Sundblad BM; Malmberg P; Larsson K
    Clin Physiol; 2001 Nov; 21(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 11722474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Airway responsiveness to histamine or methacholine: advances in measurement and interpretation.
    Hargreave FE; Sterk P; Adelroth EC; Ramsdale EH; O'Byrne PM
    Respiration; 1986; 50 Suppl 2():72-6. PubMed ID: 3550980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methacholine challenge methods.
    Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):678-680. PubMed ID: 18842907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A survey of the current use and methods of analysis of bronchoprovocational challenges.
    Scott GC; Braun SR
    Chest; 1991 Aug; 100(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 1864101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Specific conductance criteria for a positive methacholine challenge test: are the American Thoracic Society guidelines rather generous?
    Khalid I; Morris ZQ; Digiovine B
    Respir Care; 2009 Sep; 54(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19712492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.