These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12644757)

  • 21. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement.
    Cheng MS; Liao SL; Lin LL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 15364224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current indications for pegging in the anophthalmic socket: are there any?
    Jordan DR; Stoica B; Klapper SR
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 27(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 27253606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
    Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Primary placement of a titanium sleeve in hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Liao SL; Chen MS; Lin LL
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Apr; 19(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 15297860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Artificial eye amplitudes and characteristics in enucleated socket with porous polyethylene spherical and quad-motility implant.
    Lucci LM; Höfling-Lima AL; Erwenne CM; Toledo Cassano EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 18157310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multipurpose conical orbital implant in evisceration.
    Marshak H; Dresner SC
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 21(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 16234704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-stage explant-implant procedure of exposed porous orbital implants.
    Toft PB; Rasmussen ML; Prause JU
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 20528784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation.
    Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants: experience with 86 patients.
    Jordan DR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 15377905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of orbital prosthesis motility following enucleation or evisceration with sclerotomy with or without a motility coupling post in dogs.
    Yi NY; Park SA; Jeong MB; Kim WT; Kim SE; Kim JY; Chae JM; Jang KJ; Seong JK; Seo KM
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 19392873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness and safety comparison of three eye and orbital reconstruction techniques in facial plastic surgery.
    Keilani C; Baus A; Tick S; Sahel JA; Boumendil J
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2019 Aug; 64(4):351-361. PubMed ID: 30792013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposed porous orbital implants treated with simultaneous secondary implant and dermis fat graft.
    Lee BJ; Lewis CD; Perry JD
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 20523255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orbital implants: potential new directions.
    Hicks CR; Morrison D; Lou X; Crawford GJ; Gadjatsy A; Constable IJ
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2006 Nov; 3(6):805-15. PubMed ID: 17280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical analysis of hydroxyapatite orbital implantation after ocular trauma in 211 cases.
    Liang T; Zhao GQ; Meng XX; Zhang LY
    Chin J Traumatol; 2006 Oct; 9(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 17026860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical and histopathologic review of 18 explanted porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Chuo JY; Dolman PJ; Ng TL; Buffam FV; White VA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 19091412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
    Yazici B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):786-7; author reply 787. PubMed ID: 17964325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Complications of pegged and non-pegged hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Fahim DK; Frueh BR; Musch DC; Nelson CC
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 17519658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Porous orbital implant exposure: the influence of surgical technique.
    McElnea EM; Ryan A; Fulcher T
    Orbit; 2014 Apr; 33(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 24215109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Motility assessment and clinical outcomes of a magnetically integrated microporous implant.
    Miller DM; Murray T; Suarez F; Cicciarelli NL; Swords GG
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007; 38(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 17674929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.