BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12644803)

  • 1. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; D'Amario M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; Caputi S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 19544823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
    de Menezes MJ; Arrais CA; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
    Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations.
    Magne P; Kim TH; Cascione D; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 16316797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays.
    Ozturk AN; Ozturk B; Aykent F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1192-6. PubMed ID: 15544655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
    Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
    Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites.
    Cal E; Türkün LS; Türkün M; Toman M; Toksavul S
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 16288949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 114.