These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645044)

  • 1. Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney-juvenile client relationship.
    Schmidt MG; Reppucci ND; Woolard JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):175-98. PubMed ID: 12645044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of juveniles' ages and levels of psychosocial maturity on judges' opinions about adjudicative competence.
    Cox JM; Goldstein NE; Dolores J; Zelechoski AD; Messenheimer S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22471382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: age differences and delinquency.
    Modecki KL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 17546482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants.
    Kambam P; Thompson C
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 19266591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juveniles' competence to stand trial: a comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants.
    Grisso T; Steinberg L; Woolard J; Cauffman E; Scott E; Graham S; Lexcen F; Reppucci ND; Schwartz R
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Aug; 27(4):333-63. PubMed ID: 12916225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles.
    Warren JI; Aaron J; Ryan E; Chauhan P; DuVal J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 14584528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do defense attorney referrals for competence to stand trial evaluations depend on whether the client speaks English or Spanish?
    Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Gonzalez E; Gharagozloo L; Johnson SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 21104305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of the MacCAT-CA with adolescents: an item response theory investigation of age-related measurement bias.
    Viljoen JL; Slaney KL; Grisso T
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Aug; 33(4):283-97. PubMed ID: 18810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults.
    Cauffman E; Steinberg L
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):741-60. PubMed ID: 11180420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Future orientation and competence to stand trial: the fragility of competence.
    Kivisto AJ; Moore TM; Fite PA; Seidner BG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):316-26. PubMed ID: 21908747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
    Soulier M
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliminating the Competency Presumption in Juvenile Delinquency Cases.
    Katner DR
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 24(3):403-50. PubMed ID: 26809160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The competence-related abilities of adolescent defendants in criminal court.
    Poythress N; Lexcen FJ; Grisso T; Steinberg L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 16729209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attorney-client trust among convicted criminal defendants: preliminary examination of the attorney-client trust scale.
    Boccaccini MT; Brodsky SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(1-2):69-87. PubMed ID: 11979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults.
    Redlich AD; Silverman M; Steiner H
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 12808697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post-Katrina juvenile competency determinations: a tale of two systems.
    Wills CD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(2):234-9. PubMed ID: 18583701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adolescent development and juvenile justice.
    Reppucci ND
    Am J Community Psychol; 1999 Jun; 27(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 10492879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trust and understanding in the attorney-juvenile relationship.
    Pierce CS; Brodsky SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(1-2):89-107. PubMed ID: 11979493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.