These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645046)
41. Washington State's unscientific approach to the problem of repeat sex offenders. Brody AL; Green R Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 7841506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence. Levett LM; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions. Ewanation L; Maeder EM Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The civil commitment of sexually violent predators: a unique Texas approach. Bailey RK J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 12539908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Woody WD; Forrest KD Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: how do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors? Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Clark JW; Cornell DG Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(4):487-510. PubMed ID: 18683203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy. Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How bad is civil commitment? A study of attitudes toward violence and involuntary hospitalization. Mossman D; Hart KJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 8364236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. How likely is "likely to reoffend" in sex offender civil commitment trials? Knighton JC; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; Turner DB Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 24885113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials. Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Commentary: muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom. Prentky RA; Coward AI; Gabriel AM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 19092061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony. Maeder EM; Pica E Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence. Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: the impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony. Schuller RA; Cripps J Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9487789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions. Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions. Scurich N; John RS Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Devenport JL; Stinson V; Cutler BL; Kravitz DA J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1042-54. PubMed ID: 12558212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington State. Jackson RL; Richards HJ Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 17478861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]