These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645049)

  • 1. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
    Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical considerations in the interview and evaluation of sexual offenders.
    Clipson CR
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):127-73. PubMed ID: 15308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A time series modeling approach in risk appraisal of violent and sexual recidivism.
    Bani-Yaghoub M; Fedoroff JP; Curry S; Amundsen DE
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):349-66. PubMed ID: 19399599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.
    Janka C; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 22425764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors.
    Mann RE; Hanson RK; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):191-217. PubMed ID: 20363981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual recidivism in sex offenders.
    Greenberg DM
    Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Jun; 43(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 9653528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and wales.
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Howard PD
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):443-70. PubMed ID: 20930189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female and male sex offenders: a comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors.
    Freeman NJ; Sandler JC
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1394-413. PubMed ID: 18349348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the likelihood of future sexual recidivism: pilot study findings from a California sex offender risk project and cross-validation of the Static-99.
    Sreenivasan S; Garrick T; Norris R; Cusworth-Walker S; Weinberger LE; Essres G; Turner S; Fain T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):454-68. PubMed ID: 18086738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders.
    Firestone P; Nunes KL; Moulden H; Broom I; Bradford JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.